* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
@ 1999-03-23 11:32 John Wehle
[not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >
1999-03-31 23:46 ` John Wehle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: John Wehle @ 1999-03-23 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc.Espie; +Cc: law, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
>> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
>> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
>
> Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
> (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ?
He was probably just following my original patch which was created before
Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly.
-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
[not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >
@ 1999-03-23 17:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-23 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Wehle; +Cc: Marc.Espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
In message < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >you write:
> >> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
> >> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
> >
> > Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
> > (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387)
> ?
>
> He was probably just following my original patch which was created before
> Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly.
Precisely. I wasn't aware that we had switched to the symbolic form
on the x86 port. I'll take care of it.
Thanks,
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
1999-03-23 11:32 patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT John Wehle
[not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` John Wehle
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: John Wehle @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc.Espie; +Cc: law, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
>> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
>> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
>
> Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
> (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ?
He was probably just following my original patch which was created before
Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly.
-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
1999-03-23 17:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Wehle; +Cc: Marc.Espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
In message < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >you write:
> >> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
> >> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
> >
> > Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
> > (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387)
> ?
>
> He was probably just following my original patch which was created before
> Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly.
Precisely. I wasn't aware that we had switched to the symbolic form
on the x86 port. I'll take care of it.
Thanks,
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
1999-03-22 8:16 ` espie
[not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` espie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: espie @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rth; +Cc: egcs-patches, egcs
In article <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com> you write:
[about TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT and TARGET_DEFAULT for x86]
>What John is rightly saying is that someone typo'd in this
>particular instance.
when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT,
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in
(a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387").
Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead ?
What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the
same rationale that Jeff outlined basically.
If there are further issues involved in TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT vs. TARGET_DEFAULT,
I'd like to be aware of these. As far as I know, there is not even any written
documentation of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT currently... maybe this should change ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
1999-03-22 23:48 ` Jeffrey A Law
[not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck >
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: espie; +Cc: rth, egcs-patches, egcs
In message < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >you write:
> when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT,
> TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in
> (a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387").
>
> Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead > ?
> What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the
> same rationale that Jeff outlined basically.
Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is
broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we
want.
Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
1999-03-23 8:33 ` Marc Espie
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Marc Espie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marc Espie @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: law; +Cc: espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 12:36:10AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is
> broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we
> want.
> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
(MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ?
--
Marc Espie
|anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics...
|AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript...
| `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
[not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck >
@ 1999-03-23 8:33 ` Marc Espie
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Marc Espie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marc Espie @ 1999-03-23 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: law; +Cc: espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 12:36:10AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is
> broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we
> want.
> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
(MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ?
--
Marc Espie
|anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics...
|AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript...
| `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
[not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >
@ 1999-03-22 23:48 ` Jeffrey A Law
[not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck >
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-22 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: espie; +Cc: rth, egcs-patches, egcs
In message < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >you write:
> when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT,
> TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in
> (a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387").
>
> Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead > ?
> What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the
> same rationale that Jeff outlined basically.
Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is
broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we
want.
Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
[not found] ` <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com>
@ 1999-03-22 8:16 ` espie
[not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >
1999-03-31 23:46 ` espie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: espie @ 1999-03-22 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rth; +Cc: egcs-patches, egcs
In article <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com> you write:
[about TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT and TARGET_DEFAULT for x86]
>What John is rightly saying is that someone typo'd in this
>particular instance.
when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT,
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in
(a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387").
Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead ?
What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the
same rationale that Jeff outlined basically.
If there are further issues involved in TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT vs. TARGET_DEFAULT,
I'd like to be aware of these. As far as I know, there is not even any written
documentation of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT currently... maybe this should change ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-03-31 23:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-03-23 11:32 patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT John Wehle
[not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >
1999-03-23 17:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` John Wehle
[not found] <199903201949.OAA02902@jwlab.FEITH.COM>
[not found] ` <4352.922077370@upchuck>
[not found] ` <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com>
1999-03-22 8:16 ` espie
[not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >
1999-03-22 23:48 ` Jeffrey A Law
[not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck >
1999-03-23 8:33 ` Marc Espie
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Marc Espie
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` espie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).