From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5694 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2002 19:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5686 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 19:06:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 19:06:12 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJJ2fU19775; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:02:41 -0800 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:31:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Phil Edwards , Michael Elizabeth Chastain cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: What are the chances of another release from gcc-3_2-branch? Message-ID: <60950000.1040324560@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20021219005413.A31681@disaster.jaj.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01218.txt.bz2 --On Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:54:13 AM -0500 Phil Edwards wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:42:01PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain > wrote: >> My question: is it safe for me to stop testing gcc-3_2-branch? That is, >> what are the chances of another gcc release such as a "gcc 3.2.2" coming >> from the gcc-3_2-branch? I don't think any decision has been made. Personally, I'm trying to focus on 3.3/3.4; there's plenty enough to do there. But, if people want another 3.2 release we can do one. If someone else wants to step forward to run a 3.2.2 release, that would be fine, too. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com