From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.ispras.ru (mail.ispras.ru [83.149.199.84]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 200233858D38 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:43:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 200233858D38 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ispras.ru Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ispras.ru Received: from [10.10.3.121] (unknown [10.10.3.121]) by mail.ispras.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622DF40737DA; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:43:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.ispras.ru 622DF40737DA Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:43:34 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexander Monakov To: Julian Waters cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Applying extended assembly parsing to basic asm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <628548f2-a30b-ba33-133c-3accc49b9b6f@ispras.ru> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, 14 Jun 2023, Julian Waters via Gcc wrote: > Hi all, > > Would it be acceptable for a changeset that applies the parsing of string > literals in extended assembly blocks to the assembly templates inside basic > asm to be mailed here? As I see it, there is no reason to keep this > behaviour from basic asm statements and it can prove to be very useful, and > I'd be happy to submit a patch for this new behaviour to be implemented. > Basic asm would continue to behave the same as before otherwise That would be an incompatible change. Can you expand on the expected usefulness? Alexander