From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: law@redhat.com
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: C++ Issue on GCC 3.0 branch 
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:29:00 -0000
Message-id: <630.988331492@slagheap.cygnus.com>
References: <20010426170133Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg01285.html

  In message < 20010426170133Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com >you write:
  > >>>>> "law" == law  <law@redhat.com> writes:
  > 
  >     law> I've started poking at this, but I don't have a real clear
  >     law> understanding of the C++ language or its EH semantics.  About
  >     law> the only tidbit I've got that might be helpful is that we
  >     law> might be missing a call to cp_pop_exception.
  > 
  > I'm delighted that we're making progress on HPUX.  That's exciting.
  > 
  > Of course, RTH is getting ready to stand EH on its head.  So, unless
  > this happens on the mainline, it's probaby not worth looking at; the
  > whole land of exceptions is going to turn upside down RSN.
I'm really not looking at the mainline at all.  I'll put debugging EH stuff
on hold for now and look at other issues.
jeff