From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>,
"tromey@redhat.com" <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: "dje@watson.ibm.com" <dje@watson.ibm.com>,
"jbuck@synopsys.com" <jbuck@synopsys.com>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 21:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63230000.1044306396@warlock.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030203150151.132ac454.bkoz@redhat.com>
--On Monday, February 03, 2003 03:01:51 PM -0600 Benjamin Kosnik
<bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03 Feb 2003 13:32:38 -0700
> Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> This sounds good to me. What's the next step? Maybe suggest a patch
>> to the development plan?
>
> Sounds good to me.
It doesn't sound that good to me.
That's basically a feature-driven approach -- "we want these new
features". The problem with that is that we have no way of knowing
whether people will actually do the work to implement the features
or not. To a large extent, this is where we were way-back-when
before 3.0; we tried to wait until stuff got done, it always took
longer than anyone expected, while we were waiting other people
wanted to add in more stuff, that other stuff was buggy, etc.
Right now, we have a window in which to merge branches. If you're
ready, you merge; if you're not, you don't. We successfuly merged
some major technology that way for 3.4.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-03 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200301312121.QAA22864@makai.watson.ibm.com>
2003-02-03 20:44 ` Tom Tromey
2003-02-03 21:02 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2003-02-03 21:10 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2003-02-03 21:31 ` David Edelsohn
2003-02-03 21:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-02-03 22:16 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-02-03 22:30 ` Jack Lloyd
2003-02-04 1:21 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-02-03 22:03 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-02-03 21:45 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2003-02-03 21:56 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-02-03 22:34 ` Tom Tromey
2003-02-03 23:03 ` David Edelsohn
2003-02-03 21:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-02-03 21:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-02-03 21:41 ` David Edelsohn
2003-02-03 21:42 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
[not found] <1044318563.708.247.camel@steven>
2003-02-04 1:13 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-02-04 0:31 Steven Bosscher
[not found] <1043976898.27601.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org>
2003-02-03 19:50 ` Tim Josling
2003-02-03 21:54 ` Devang Patel
2003-02-03 22:32 ` Geoff Keating
2003-02-04 20:17 ` Tim Josling
2003-02-04 20:47 ` Matt Austern
2003-02-06 19:26 ` Tim Josling
2003-02-04 0:05 ` Tim Hollebeek
2003-02-04 20:07 ` Tim Josling
2003-02-04 2:03 ` Richard Henderson
2003-02-04 2:26 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-02-04 4:14 ` Daniel Berlin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-02 6:17 Brad Lucier
[not found] <20030131165429.32d4d907.bkoz@redhat.com>
2003-02-01 1:32 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-02-01 1:43 ` Jan Hubicka
[not found] <200301312258.OAA14911@emf.net>
2003-02-01 0:00 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 16:29 Richard Kenner
2003-01-31 5:15 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-01-31 10:39 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 17:54 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-01-31 0:37 Benjamin Kosnik
2003-01-31 0:52 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-01-31 1:16 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 1:34 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-01-31 17:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-31 1:14 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 1:25 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2003-01-31 1:27 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2003-01-31 1:52 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2003-01-31 20:59 ` Joe Buck
2003-01-31 22:44 ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-31 6:09 ` Joe Buck
2003-01-31 7:39 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-01-31 20:43 ` Geoff Keating
[not found] ` <200301312127.QAA22861@caip.rutgers.edu>
[not found] ` <jmy9516lsd.fsf@desire.geoffk.org>
2003-02-01 4:32 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-01-31 11:52 ` Tom Lord
2003-01-31 20:52 ` Joe Buck
[not found] ` <200301312311.PAA15835@emf.net>
2003-02-01 1:28 ` Joe Buck
2003-02-01 1:49 ` Michel LESPINASSE
2003-01-31 21:07 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 13:50 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-01-31 18:02 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-31 19:05 ` Devang Patel
2003-01-31 20:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-31 20:37 ` Graham Stott
2003-01-31 20:57 ` Devang Patel
2003-01-31 21:35 ` Tom Tromey
2003-01-31 21:02 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-01-31 21:13 ` Joel Sherrill
2003-01-31 21:21 ` Devang Patel
2003-01-31 22:59 ` Joel Sherrill
2003-01-31 23:42 ` Devang Patel
2003-01-31 19:44 ` Matt Austern
2003-01-31 20:23 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-02-01 0:21 ` Michael Matz
2003-02-01 3:18 ` David Edelsohn
2003-01-31 20:31 ` Richard Henderson
2003-01-31 22:59 ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-01-31 23:12 ` Phil Edwards
2003-01-30 23:53 Karel Gardas
2003-01-31 0:13 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-30 20:00 Benjamin Kosnik
2003-01-30 21:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-30 21:42 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 13:31 ` Nathan Sidwell
2003-01-30 22:15 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-01-30 22:56 ` Neil Booth
2003-01-30 22:58 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-30 23:22 ` Michael Matz
2003-01-30 23:25 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-31 11:16 ` Bernd Jendrissek
2003-01-30 23:55 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 0:11 ` Paolo Carlini
2003-01-31 0:15 ` Neil Booth
2003-01-31 0:29 ` Phil Edwards
2003-01-31 0:30 ` Neil Booth
2003-01-31 2:08 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 16:01 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-01-31 0:41 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 0:17 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2003-01-31 0:21 ` Neil Booth
2003-01-31 0:25 ` Matt Austern
2003-01-31 1:10 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2003-01-31 1:22 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-01-31 1:55 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 1:54 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-31 2:40 ` Geoff Keating
2003-01-31 12:54 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-01-31 20:22 ` Geoff Keating
2003-01-30 11:22 Mark Mitchell
2003-01-30 19:07 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-30 19:58 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-30 20:15 ` Mike Stump
2003-01-30 20:59 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-30 19:20 ` Matt Austern
2003-01-30 19:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-01-30 20:11 ` David Edelsohn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63230000.1044306396@warlock.codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=bkoz@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jbuck@synopsys.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).