From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116517-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8955 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 02:19:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8330 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2005 02:19:34 -0000
Received: from ds01.webmacher.de (HELO ds01.webmacher.de) (213.239.192.226)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:19:34 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (F31a9.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.49.169])
	by ds01.webmacher.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 517F34441A5; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20050629012134.GA8559@topo.toronto.redhat.com>
References: <42C13D4D.9040604@adacore.com> <m3d5q6fyrf.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <42C14930.40402@adacore.com> <m3br5qei15.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <42C1D610.6030701@futureapps.de> <m3zmtakpig.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <42C1EAEF.8010400@adacore.com> <m3oe9qkn6x.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <42C1EFEA.6020602@adacore.com> <m31x6mj77a.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20050629012134.GA8559@topo.toronto.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <647A8A45-AA32-42EC-8E29-9E403A79DF40@dalecki.de>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
	Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>, gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marcin Dalecki <martin@dalecki.de>
Subject: Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:19:00 -0000
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01228.txt.bz2


On 2005-06-29, at 03:21, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:13:45AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
>> Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> writes:
>> |      You did not read anything even vaguely saying that in what  
>> I wrote.
>>
>> and you, did you?
>>
>>
> Folks, can you take this offline?  It's getting rather tiresome.

The only thing this thread teaches me is the conviction that *every*
instruction set architecture, which relies on compilers to make the most
out if it is severely ill guided.