From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23864 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2002 00:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23763 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 00:45:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2002 00:45:04 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1M0iv503651 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:44:57 -0800 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:48:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: GCC 3.1 Branch Message-ID: <66830000.1014338695@warlock.codesourcery.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg01227.txt.bz2 I intend to create the GCC 3.1 branch sometime tomorrow. If you know of a reason why we should not create the branch, please let me know. (I'm not sure what this would be, but just in case...) Thank you, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com