* Question about -Os handling of fold_builtin_strcpy()
@ 2010-03-24 21:27 Dave Hudson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Hudson @ 2010-03-24 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Is there any obvious reason why this function doesn't enable folding if we're optimizing for size? All of the other string/memory folds appear to rely on the various move, clear or set ratios?
When optimizing small string copies it's definitely smaller to do this inline on some ISAs.
Thanks,
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-03-24 18:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-24 21:27 Question about -Os handling of fold_builtin_strcpy() Dave Hudson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).