Broken link

Broken link

[Felix Wiemann]

Hi,

the link to http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1.1/ on page
http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html doesn't work.

Felix Wiemann

Re: Broken link

[Mark Mitchell]

--On Sunday, July 28, 2002 01:52:56 PM +0200 Felix Wiemann 
<Felix.Wiemann@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the link to http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1.1/ on page
> http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html doesn't work.

Fixed; thanks.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Re: Broken Link

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 20 November 2015 at 13:12,  <melissa.holmes@wiht-email.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wanted to reach out and let you know about this link which isn’t working -
> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/, I
> found it on this page -
> http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html. You’re
> link includes this text - "Objective-C Language Description", if that helps
> you find it.

That page is not hosted by the GCC project.

The official version of the page has a working link:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html

Broken Link

[melissa.holmes]

Hey,

I wanted to reach out and let you know about this link which isn’t 
working - 
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/, I 
found it on this page - 
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html. 
You’re link includes this text - "Objective-C Language Description", 
if that helps you find it.

We’ve put together a guide to Objective C, which includes a brief 
history, some useful online resources and books, and an introduction to 
Swift, the successor to Objective C > http://wiht.link/objectivecguide. 
I thought that it might make a suitable alternative to point your site 
visitors to.

All the best,
Melissa

Re: Broken link

[Jonathan Wakely]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 817 bytes --]

2011/12/5 Jonathan Wakely:
> 2011/12/5 Marco Antonio Gómez Martín:
>>        Hello,
>>
>>        Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>>
>>        The table entries:
>>
>> Defining move special member functions  N3053   GCC 4.6
>> Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept]  N3050   GCC 4.6 (core
>> language only)
>>
>>        have the proposal link broken (they need an extra 'l' at the end:
>> .html instead of .htm)
>
> Thanks for reporting the problems, I'll fix them later today.
>
> N.B. same issue in these copies:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html

Fixed by this patch.

Thanks again for reporting it.

[-- Attachment #2: links.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4370 bytes --]

Index: gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 cxx0x_status.html
--- gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html	19 May 2010 16:07:30 -0000	1.10
+++ gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html	5 Dec 2011 21:50:40 -0000
@@ -263,12 +263,12 @@
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept]</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.htm">N3050</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.html">N3050</a></td>
       <td align="center"><span class="unsupported">No</span></td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Defining move special member functions</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.htm">N3053</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.html">N3053</a></td>
       <td align="center"><span class="unsupported">No</span></td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
Index: gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 cxx0x_status.html
--- gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html	2 Nov 2010 04:54:56 -0000	1.10
+++ gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html	5 Dec 2011 21:50:40 -0000
@@ -263,12 +263,12 @@
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept]</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.htm">N3050</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.html">N3050</a></td>
       <td align="center"><span class="supported">Yes</span> (core language only)</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Defining move special member functions</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.htm">N3053</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.html">N3053</a></td>
       <td align="center"><span class="supported">Yes</span></td>
     </tr>
 
Index: gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 cxx0x_status.html
--- gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html	5 Dec 2011 16:12:38 -0000	1.7
+++ gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html	5 Dec 2011 21:50:40 -0000
@@ -264,12 +264,12 @@
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept]</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.htm">N3050</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.html">N3050</a></td>
       <td align="center"><span class="supported">Yes</span> (core language only)</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Defining move special member functions</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.htm">N3053</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.html">N3053</a></td>
       <td align="center"><span class="supported">Yes</span></td>
     </tr>
 
Index: projects/cxx0x.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/cxx0x.html,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.53 cxx0x.html
--- projects/cxx0x.html	5 Dec 2011 16:12:39 -0000	1.53
+++ projects/cxx0x.html	5 Dec 2011 21:50:40 -0000
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept]</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.htm">N3050</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3050.html">N3050</a></td>
       <td align="center"><a href="../gcc-4.6/changes.html">GCC 4.6</a> (core language only)</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td>Defining move special member functions</td>
-      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.htm">N3053</a></td>
+      <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3053.html">N3053</a></td>
       <td align="center"><a href="../gcc-4.6/changes.html">GCC 4.6</a></td>
     </tr>
     <tr>

Re: Broken link

[Jonathan Wakely]

2011/12/5 Marco Antonio Gómez Martín:
>        Hello,
>
>        Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>
>        The table entries:
>
> Defining move special member functions  N3053   GCC 4.6
> Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept]  N3050   GCC 4.6 (core
> language only)
>
>        have the proposal link broken (they need an extra 'l' at the end:
> .html instead of .htm)

Thanks for reporting the problems, I'll fix them later today.

N.B. same issue in these copies:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html

Broken link

[Marco Antonio Gómez Martín]

	Hello,

	Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at

http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html

	The table entries:

Defining move special member functions 	N3053 	GCC 4.6
Allowing move constructors to throw [noexcept] 	N3050 	GCC 4.6 (core 
language only)

	have the proposal link broken (they need an extra 'l' at the end: .html 
instead of .htm)

	Best regards,
		Marco

Re: broken link

[Jonathan Bartlett]

> Thanks!  Jonathan, can I get a copy of the 2.95 and 3.0 version?  The
> links are broken.

Hmmmmm....  I can't find my version of 2.95.  Brian Young's extension of
it is there, though.  The 3.0 link worked for me.

Jon

>
> -Andy
>
> On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 16:45, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> > Aha!  I did not know that Wolfram shut off my account :(
> >
> > Good dectective work - you found me!  Another link that might eventually
> > be of interest to the GCC site is the book I'm working on - Programming
> > from the Ground Up - which includes a description of the x86 calling
> > convention on x86.
> >
> > I also promise I'll upgrade toy to gcc 3.1 soon.  I managed to make the
> > current port before having kids, and now my time is drained.  I'm sure
> > many of you understand :)
> >
> > Jonathan Bartlett
> >
> > On Fri, 24 May 2002, John Marshall wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > > > > Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
> > > > > working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
> > > > > or should I remove the link?
> > > >
> > > > Mail to Jonathan bounced, and Google failed to provide a different
> > > > address for that document
> > >
> > > Google for me ("find pages similar to <above URL>") didn't have too much
> > > trouble finding
> > >
> > > 	http://www.eskimo.com/~johnnyb/computers/toy/
> > >
> > > (although some tarballs there are missing) and also lists
> > >
> > > 	http://www.advogato.org/person/johnnyb/
> > >
> > > which contains a probably working email address for Jonathan (which I've
> > > cc'ed).
> > >
> > >     John
> > >
> >
> --
> http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
> http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
> Java
> http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
> structure
> 		    a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
> The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
> vote.
> -Ambassador Kosh
>

Re: broken link

[Andrew C. Oliver]

Thanks!  Jonathan, can I get a copy of the 2.95 and 3.0 version?  The
links are broken.

-Andy

On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 16:45, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> Aha!  I did not know that Wolfram shut off my account :(
> 
> Good dectective work - you found me!  Another link that might eventually
> be of interest to the GCC site is the book I'm working on - Programming
> from the Ground Up - which includes a description of the x86 calling
> convention on x86.
> 
> I also promise I'll upgrade toy to gcc 3.1 soon.  I managed to make the
> current port before having kids, and now my time is drained.  I'm sure
> many of you understand :)
> 
> Jonathan Bartlett
> 
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, John Marshall wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > > > Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
> > > > working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
> > > > or should I remove the link?
> > >
> > > Mail to Jonathan bounced, and Google failed to provide a different
> > > address for that document
> >
> > Google for me ("find pages similar to <above URL>") didn't have too much
> > trouble finding
> >
> > 	http://www.eskimo.com/~johnnyb/computers/toy/
> >
> > (although some tarballs there are missing) and also lists
> >
> > 	http://www.advogato.org/person/johnnyb/
> >
> > which contains a probably working email address for Jonathan (which I've
> > cc'ed).
> >
> >     John
> >
> 
-- 
http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
Java                            
http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
structure
		    a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh

Re: broken link

[Jonathan Bartlett]

Aha!  I did not know that Wolfram shut off my account :(

Good dectective work - you found me!  Another link that might eventually
be of interest to the GCC site is the book I'm working on - Programming
from the Ground Up - which includes a description of the x86 calling
convention on x86.

I also promise I'll upgrade toy to gcc 3.1 soon.  I managed to make the
current port before having kids, and now my time is drained.  I'm sure
many of you understand :)

Jonathan Bartlett

On Fri, 24 May 2002, John Marshall wrote:

> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > > Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
> > > working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
> > > or should I remove the link?
> >
> > Mail to Jonathan bounced, and Google failed to provide a different
> > address for that document
>
> Google for me ("find pages similar to <above URL>") didn't have too much
> trouble finding
>
> 	http://www.eskimo.com/~johnnyb/computers/toy/
>
> (although some tarballs there are missing) and also lists
>
> 	http://www.advogato.org/person/johnnyb/
>
> which contains a probably working email address for Jonathan (which I've
> cc'ed).
>
>     John
>

Re: broken link

[Ricardo Anguiano]

The similar pages link (such a nice google feature) from a search hit
on Johnny's old page yielded this working page:

http://www.eskimo.com/~johnnyb/computers/toy/

Also, the toy package seems to have moved to this location
http://primates.ximian.com/~michael/toy-3.1.1.tar.gz

Last I checked it was broken wrt recent gcc.

-Ricardo

Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
> > working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
> > or should I remove the link?
> 
> Mail to Jonathan bounced, and Google failed to provide a different
> address for that document, so I'm afraid we'll have to remove it, though
> I'd appreciate any hints.
> 
> Gerald
> -- 
> Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

Re: broken link

[John Marshall]

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
> > working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
> > or should I remove the link?
> 
> Mail to Jonathan bounced, and Google failed to provide a different
> address for that document

Google for me ("find pages similar to <above URL>") didn't have too much
trouble finding

	http://www.eskimo.com/~johnnyb/computers/toy/

(although some tarballs there are missing) and also lists

	http://www.advogato.org/person/johnnyb/

which contains a probably working email address for Jonathan (which I've
cc'ed).

    John

Re: broken link

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
> working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
> or should I remove the link?

Mail to Jonathan bounced, and Google failed to provide a different
address for that document, so I'm afraid we'll have to remove it, though
I'd appreciate any hints.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

Re: broken link

[Gerald Pfeifer]

Jonathan, as the author of the document mentioned below, is there are
working link for what used to be at http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/
or should I remove the link?

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> (http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/) I was unpleasently
> suprised by a 404 error.  I cried myself to sleep and when I woke up I
> thought...why...how about writing those GNU people and maybe it will get
> fixed and you'll reach front end enlightenment!  Anyhow...
>
> If you go here: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html and clcik
> on "A toy example language" its a 404.

Thanks,
Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

broken link

[Andrew C. Oliver]

Hi Gnubians,

I was hoping to read all about front ends in gcc and to start thinking 
about one day implementing
one for D (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html) but alas as I 
browsed to the example page that would enlighten me as to how this would 
be done (http://members.wri.com/johnnyb/compilers/) I was unpleasently 
suprised by a 404 error.  I cried myself to sleep and when I woke up I 
thought...why...how about writing those GNU people and maybe it will get 
fixed and you'll reach front end enlightenment!  Anyhow...

If you go here: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html and clcik 
on "A toy example language" its a 404.

Thanks,

Andy
       

broken link

[Herbert Schmid]

Hi,

your page http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html misses a single slash.
You set the link

<a href="news/profiledriven.html">infrastructure for profile drive 
optimizations</a>

But what you want is "/news/profiledriven.html".

Yours,
Herbert Schmid
-----------------
Redaktion c't

Helstorfer Str. 7
D-30625 Hannover
Germany

Re: Broken link

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> >today the following link from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ does'nt
> >work for me:
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/
> 
> Hmm.  I fixed this temporarily, but I don't understand what happened.

I suggest upgrading makeinfo to 4.1, and see if that helps.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk

Re: Broken link

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 02:01:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 07:55:24PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >today the following link from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ does'nt
> >work for me:
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/
> 
> Hmm.  I fixed this temporarily, but I don't understand what happened.
> 
> Many of the files in the above directory have had the first letter in
> their filenames capitalized.  So, there was an Index.html but no
> index.html.  Shades of Microsoft Windows...
> 
> I'll leave it to someone else to figure out why.  I've just set up
> a symbolic link so that things will work correctly.

Index.html is probably the texinfo documentation's fault (makeinfo
--html); it's the actual index, as opposed to index.html which should
be the front of the manual.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: Broken link

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 07:55:24PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>Hi,
>
>today the following link from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ does'nt
>work for me:
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/

Hmm.  I fixed this temporarily, but I don't understand what happened.

Many of the files in the above directory have had the first letter in
their filenames capitalized.  So, there was an Index.html but no
index.html.  Shades of Microsoft Windows...

I'll leave it to someone else to figure out why.  I've just set up
a symbolic link so that things will work correctly.

cgf

Broken link

[Paolo Carlini]

Hi,

today the following link from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ does'nt work for
me:

    http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/

Ciao,
Paolo.

Re: broken link

[Joe Buck]

> 
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Murali Potla wrote:
> > The link to gcc 3.0.1 is not proper.
> 
> Sorry, but you didn't provide sufficient information.
> 
> Where (on which page) is that link...
> 
> > it's pointing to 3.0 release.
> 
> ...and where does it point to?

He probably means that the link with the text "3.0.1" points to the page

gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.html

and he didn't notice that this now has a 3.0.1 announcement, probably
because the link color indicates that he already visited that page.  This
is because you erased history, Gerald.  There should be a new
gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.1.html page.  The reason is that if you go further down on
the page, you see

June 18, 2001
	GCC 3.0 has been released.

with a link that now points to the 3.0.1 announcement.  The original
3.0 announcement was overwritten.  The web site should contain both
announcements in two separate pages, or at least two places on the
same page.

Re: broken link

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Murali Potla wrote:
> The link to gcc 3.0.1 is not proper.

Sorry, but you didn't provide sufficient information.

Where (on which page) is that link...

> it's pointing to 3.0 release.

...and where does it point to?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

broken link

[Murali Potla]

The link to gcc 3.0.1 is not proper.
it's pointing to 3.0 release.
Please do update it.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

Re: Broken Link

[David Edelsohn]

>>>>> "Freemyer, Donovan L" writes:

Donovan> The Aix link on
Donovan> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/install/binaries.html should probably point
Donovan> to http://freeware.bull.net/download/aix432/gnu.gcc-2.95.3.0.exe

	The link already has been updated in the GCC sources.  It will
appear properly on the websites when they are next updated.

Thanks, David

Broken Link

[Freemyer, Donovan L]

Hi,
	The Aix link on
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/install/binaries.html should probably point
to http://freeware.bull.net/download/aix432/gnu.gcc-2.95.3.0.exe

Donovan Freemyer 

Re: broken link

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, bhunt wrote:
> The last link on your mirrors page should be changed.
> Offending page: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
> Offending link: US (Arizona): ftp.ninemoons.com
> < ftp://ftp.ninemoons.com/pub/mirrors/egcs/ >, thanks to Costas Troulos
> < mailto:ktroulos@noc.ntua.gr >.

I checked, and the new site does not have a mirror of gcc.gnu.org, so I
removed that link. Patch below.

Thanks for letting as know.

Gerald

Index: mirrors.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/mirrors.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -3 -p -r1.96 mirrors.html
--- mirrors.html	2000/11/29 18:18:26	1.96
+++ mirrors.html	2001/02/09 09:07:02
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ if you are mirroring the GCC pages so we
 <li>UK: <a href=" ftp://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/Mirrors/sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/gcc/ ">sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk</a>
 <li>US (California): <a href=" ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/ ">ftp.freesoftware.com</a>
 <li>US (California): <a href=" ftp://ftp.yggdrasil.com/mirrors/site/egcs.cygnus.com/pub/egcs/ ">ftp.yggdrasil.com</a>
-<li>US (Arizona): <a href=" ftp://ftp.ninemoons.com/pub/mirrors/egcs/ ">ftp.ninemoons.com</a>, thanks to <a href=" mailto:ktroulos@noc.ntua.gr ">Costas Troulos</a>.
 </ul>

 <p>If you wish to host a new mirror site, please contact

broken link

[bhunt]

The last link on your mirrors page should be changed.
Offending page: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
Offending link: US (Arizona): ftp.ninemoons.com
< ftp://ftp.ninemoons.com/pub/mirrors/egcs/ >, thanks to Costas Troulos
< mailto:ktroulos@noc.ntua.gr >. 

Here is the message from the server:
The material that used to be available on this site has moved to
ftp.geekgadgets.org. Please visit that site for your ftp needs. If you
reached this site via a link on another site, please let that site's
webmaster know that their link needs to be updated. If there are any
problems or questions, please send email to Fred Fish (fnf@ninemoons.com). 

Brett Hunt
Systems Integration
Micron Technology

ps sorry about the rich text format