From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30253 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 03:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30052 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 03:54:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 03:54:39 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB53oBK01254; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:50:11 -0800 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 19:54:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Phil Edwards , "Joseph S. Myers" cc: guerby@acm.org, schwab@suse.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc-ss-20011203 is now available Message-ID: <6910000.1007519297@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011204153416.A24659@disaster.jaj.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 > Doesn't gcc_release do a build in order to ensure the generated source > files are there? Yes. I added this both to reduce the amount of logic necessary to create releases and also as a final sanity check. The script does a full bootstrap. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com