From: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>,
Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Rupert Wood <me@rupey.net>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 18:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6997EA81-4E6A-11D7-80F3-000393D76DAA@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E649FF8.9000105@codesourcery.com>
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 04:45 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> Could the C++ front end be modified to make it compilable with any C
>> compiler (ignoring for the moment that parts of the C++ front end are
>> now written in ISO c90). That is, how many gnu extensions are used,
>> and can they be easily removed?
> a quick compile with -pedantic shows,
> char bitfields such as
> 1 cp-tree.h: unsigned char is_lang_type_class : 1;. Making this an int
> would
> enlarge that structure.
> 2 the tree checking stuff uses '({ ...})', but only when compiled with
> GCC
> 3 decl.c: (cond_expr) = value
> this hides inside things like 'current_binding_level = newlevel;'
> 4 some minor syntactic things that have crept in (extra ',', ';')
If you really want to be compliant, all external names have to be unique
within 6 characters, case-insensitive (3.1.2). Somehow I doubt that's
going to happen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-04 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18DAD4FC1@whale.softwire.co.uk>
2003-03-04 11:55 ` Rupert Wood
2003-03-04 12:11 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-04 12:46 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 13:57 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-03-04 14:21 ` Lars Segerlund
2003-03-04 14:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-04 14:46 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-03-04 14:53 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-04 15:03 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 15:11 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-03-04 15:19 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-04 15:26 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 16:30 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-03-04 17:17 ` Steven Bosscher
2003-03-04 17:41 ` Phil Edwards
2003-03-04 18:37 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-03-05 10:51 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-03-05 18:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-04 17:33 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 17:53 ` Phil Edwards
2003-03-04 20:50 ` Geoff Keating
2003-03-04 21:01 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 22:03 ` Geoff Keating
2003-03-04 22:49 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-04 23:07 ` Gareth Pearce
2003-03-05 2:13 ` Michael S. Zick
2003-03-05 2:19 ` Gareth Pearce
2003-03-05 0:50 ` Diego Novillo
2003-03-04 18:26 ` Geert Bosch
2003-03-04 21:48 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-05 2:55 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-03-04 13:52 ` Nathan Sidwell
2003-03-04 14:22 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-04 16:40 ` Nathan Sidwell
2003-03-04 18:18 ` Dale Johannesen [this message]
2003-03-04 19:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-05 16:51 ` Marc Espie
2003-03-05 18:42 ` Dale Johannesen
2003-03-08 19:23 Robert Dewar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-08 19:00 Robert Dewar
2003-03-06 20:36 Nathanael Nerode
2003-03-06 20:23 Tim Josling
2003-03-06 17:17 Joern Rennecke
2003-03-06 18:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-07 19:04 ` Toon Moene
2003-03-05 23:03 Robert Dewar
2003-03-06 7:18 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-06 7:53 ` Karel Gardas
2003-03-06 9:17 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-06 17:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-03-06 22:23 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-06 22:30 ` Karel Gardas
2003-03-06 22:52 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-06 23:31 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-05 22:42 Chris Lattner
2003-03-05 21:07 Benjamin Kosnik
2003-03-05 22:18 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-06 9:13 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-03-06 11:08 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-06 17:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-03-05 16:20 Robert Dewar
2003-03-05 16:31 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-05 18:52 ` Matt Austern
2003-03-05 21:20 ` Toon Moene
2003-03-05 21:28 ` tm_gccmail
2003-03-05 21:29 ` Fabio Alemagna
2003-03-05 22:12 ` Karel Gardas
2003-03-06 12:39 ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-06 7:58 ` Lars Segerlund
2003-03-06 11:47 ` Vladimir Merzliakov
2003-03-05 4:27 Robert Dewar
2003-03-05 7:00 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-05 7:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-05 19:18 ` Mike Stump
2003-03-04 18:14 Nathanael Nerode
2003-03-04 18:21 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 18:28 ` Geert Bosch
2003-03-04 19:35 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 17:55 Benjamin Kosnik
2003-03-04 20:02 ` Matt Austern
2003-03-04 20:08 ` Gareth Pearce
2003-03-04 21:50 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-05 8:48 ` Lars Segerlund
2003-03-05 9:40 ` Tom Lord
2003-03-04 22:02 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 17:30 Benjamin Kosnik
2003-03-04 17:29 Benjamin Kosnik
2003-03-04 16:56 Nathanael Nerode
2003-03-04 10:19 Nathanael Nerode
2003-03-04 10:23 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 11:20 ` Pop Sébastian
2003-03-04 12:42 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 9:53 Nathanael Nerode
2003-03-04 10:06 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 11:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-03-04 3:06 Tom Tromey
2003-03-04 5:45 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-05 0:54 ` Mike Stump
2003-03-04 7:01 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 7:12 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 7:54 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 9:20 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 17:35 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 15:05 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-04 15:06 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 15:08 ` Lars Segerlund
2003-03-04 15:12 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 15:33 ` Lars Segerlund
2003-03-04 15:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-04 16:01 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-03-04 16:09 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-03-04 16:49 ` Nathan Sidwell
2003-03-04 17:18 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-03-04 21:46 ` Michael Matz
2003-03-04 17:20 ` Andrew Haley
2003-03-04 17:36 ` Tom Tromey
2003-03-06 14:59 ` Fergus Henderson
2003-03-07 3:51 ` Per Bothner
2003-03-07 13:39 ` Pop Sébastian
2003-03-07 20:41 ` Neil Booth
2003-03-07 20:49 ` Per Bothner
2003-03-07 21:52 ` Geoff Keating
2003-03-07 21:57 ` Per Bothner
2003-03-07 22:55 ` Neil Booth
2003-03-07 22:57 ` Geoff Keating
2003-03-07 23:05 ` tm_gccmail
2003-03-07 23:24 ` law
2003-03-07 23:07 ` Neil Booth
2003-03-07 23:09 ` Geert Bosch
2003-03-07 23:19 ` Neil Booth
2003-03-08 0:37 ` Steven Bosscher
2003-03-08 2:09 ` Laurent Guerby
2003-03-08 15:27 ` Toon Moene
2003-03-07 20:13 ` Joseph S. Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6997EA81-4E6A-11D7-80F3-000393D76DAA@apple.com \
--to=dalej@apple.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=me@rupey.net \
--cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).