From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685C4387722A for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:18:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 685C4387722A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sandoe.co.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sandoe.co.uk Received: (qmail 52135 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2022 16:18:00 -0000 X-APM-Out-ID: 16704298805213 X-APM-Authkey: 257869/1(257869/1) 7 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpclient.apple) (81.138.1.83) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 7 Dec 2022 16:18:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) Subject: Re: Naming flag for specifying the output file name for Binary Module Interface files From: Iain Sandoe In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:18:00 +0000 Cc: Jonathan Wakely , "chuanqi.xcq" , David Blaikie , Nathan Sidwell , "ben.boeckel" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6CFAC937-F5FD-49B3-A5E3-4ED83B270DCC@sandoe.co.uk> References: <96699ff0-f4d7-4276-8af7-5a4ce9735174@acm.org> To: GCC Development X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_COUK,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Folks, > On 7 Dec 2022, at 15:45, ben.boeckel via Gcc wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 15:23:09 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> I disagree. I can easily remember "module output" but I would have to = check >> the manual every time to see if it's "std c++ module save file" or = some >> other permutation of those words For my 0.02GBP, I had previously suggested = =E2=80=9C-fc++-module-file[name=3D]=E2=80=9C In review, that was felt to be possibly unwieldy if there was a default = (e.g. that the module BMI takes the basename and appends .gcm/pcm), but I will offer = the suggestion a second time ;) I think it is reasonable to include c++ in the spelling, since other = languages supported by GCC (and clang in due course) have modules. Iain