public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@adacore.com>, "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, amonakov@ispras.ru, abel@ispras.ru,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Selective scheduling and its usage
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c3c3ce2-b5b0-a22b-641b-6cd5ae9bb50a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1896976.h1cWcUzf4a@polaris>

On 03/29/2018 04:15 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
>>
>> and many others.
> 
> Right, and some of them are P1/P2, which doesn't really make sense IMO.
I'm  of the opinion we should deprecate the selective scheduler.  IA64
is a don't care and while it works on other targets, I don't think it's
getting significant use in the wild -- and it's a significant
maintenance burden release to release.

I haven't pushed much on it because I'm slammed with a ton of other
stuff, but I just don't see that selective-scheduling on the right side
of the cost/benefit analysis.

jeff

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-29 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21  9:49 Martin Liška
2018-03-21 10:18 ` Andrey Belevantsev
2018-03-21 10:32   ` Martin Liška
2018-03-21 10:48     ` Andrey Belevantsev
2018-03-29 10:15 ` Eric Botcazou
2018-03-29 12:09   ` Richard Biener
2018-03-29 15:14     ` Eric Botcazou
2018-03-29 18:10       ` Richard Biener
2018-03-29 15:14   ` Jeff Law [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c3c3ce2-b5b0-a22b-641b-6cd5ae9bb50a@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=abel@ispras.ru \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).