From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A073858D20 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:31:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 59A073858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 104FF201A7; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:31:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1668169901; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KwNGlAbfaZXJsrBOGQWCmGe02pPwsqOF4yCBVJsL3u0=; b=JbstvwBDon4sKw3BdPg+xfVCHq6YN0K8swtZDfS16333iBvV1zZmZoucGqBFS4UDCQ4s+S aNMpZBbVFPTBtKuwDkFuqIG3Ejj3Yz3OA+SKizmNlcMnotXCctOHZV9XkAt/CCzpXT8irG d9VN15kPhxpjDcur3t1QxPjeYrtcC9I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1668169901; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KwNGlAbfaZXJsrBOGQWCmGe02pPwsqOF4yCBVJsL3u0=; b=JbOs9o3m3INpozRRd/zPKLkmDIZ5d+pDkeA5fL59MxIEG/LDOdMtnWPkmjaqTw3zs6GDyp ggq8zoWsW3KykQDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF88A13357; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id eFovNaxAbmOiSwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:31:40 +0000 Message-ID: <6dd38274-02bb-fc3f-637f-36f3c26b93c2@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:31:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: Links to web pages are broken. Content-Language: en-US To: Georg-Johann Lay , Jonathan Wakely , Richard Biener Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer References: <397083e0-8dc1-1931-306a-8517f2a4c72d@gjlay.de> <829ffa99-bbd9-cf98-50bd-9575a22f20b1@suse.cz> <4efbb4d0-3f8f-48f0-cb65-a691bb0d634a@gjlay.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= In-Reply-To: <4efbb4d0-3f8f-48f0-cb65-a691bb0d634a@gjlay.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 11/11/22 13:14, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > > Am 11.11.22 um 09:48 schrieb Martin Liška: >> On 11/10/22 18:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> Maybe just "docs" or "trunkdocs" or "latestdocs" instead of >>> "onlinedocs-new", since that is (1) very long, and (2) will look silly >>> in ten years when it's not new and we need to add >>> onlinedocs-even-newer 😉 >> >> I do support it, it would be probably nicer than the complicated Rewrite rule >> Jonathan prepared. >> >>> >>> Or even onlinedocs/latest/ for the new stuff, and leave the old stuff >>> there in onlinedocs/ (without linking to it) so that old links work. >> >> I think we should add a new HTML header to the older documentation >> saying that's legacy. Something one can see here: >> https://matplotlib.org/3.3.4/tutorials/index.html >> >> Martin > > Why it's legacy? > > If I want docs for v12.2, then I don't care whether its generated by sphinx or texinfo. > > Just using a different documentation system won't render the very content legacy? Sure, that will be very same story only we'll have an older releases using Sphinx. I'm not fully convinced, but e.g. adding the banner for all unsupported branches seems reasonable to me. But I don't have a strong opinion about it. > > I think it's a good idea to keep the old docs under their known URLs. > > > BTW, also search results from search engines are all 404. You mean Google links, right? Correct, so that's why we incline now to keeping old links and introducing a new url /docs Thanks for comments, Martin > > > Johann > >