From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11564 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2001 17:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11543 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 17:42:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gandalf.codesourcery.com) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 17:42:05 -0000 Received: from gandalf.codesourcery.com (IDENT:mitchell@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gandalf.codesourcery.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB3Ha8817646; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:36:08 -0800 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 09:42:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: "lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net" , Joe Buck cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: fix for PR 4447: is this really correct? Message-ID: <75600000.1007400967@gandalf.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <3C0A0EF2.80D117A@users.sourceforge.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 > I think it's not so important for 3.0.3. However, I plan to submit an > implementation for 3.1. I didn't think reinterpret_cast was legal in a template parameter. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com