From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56836 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2019 11:04:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 56826 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2019 11:04:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=february, Emrich, emrich, February X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (HELO mout.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:04:51 +0000 Received: from addc1.ad.local.emrich-ebersheim.de ([24.134.13.209]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MVvCn-1hNo8V4AQH-00RnDP; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:04:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by addc1.ad.local.emrich-ebersheim.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F47A282853; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:04:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from addc1.ad.local.emrich-ebersheim.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (addc1.ad.local.emrich-ebersheim.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfTCAmbqtK9T; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:04:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8106:22a:130d:f527:c8be:68d:baaa] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8106:22a:130d:f527:c8be:68d:baaa]) by addc1.ad.local.emrich-ebersheim.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA9E28015E; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:04:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: dg-extract-results broken since rev 268511, was Re: Status of 9.0.1 20190415 [trunk revision 270358] on x86_64-w64-mingw32 From: Rainer Emrich To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: gcc Mailing List , christophe.lyon@linaro.org References: <20190415153842.GU21066@tucnak> <34226dcf-24e4-370f-0f88-a69d979aef2e@emrich-ebersheim.de> <97c67265-af2a-b3f2-eecc-168abf4b5a6c@emrich-ebersheim.de> <8baf303a-9f01-15ec-7bbc-7b3419a96f00@emrich-ebersheim.de> Openpgp: url=random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de Message-ID: <782fe033-0797-5574-0d62-af3ab4bf881e@emrich-ebersheim.de> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8baf303a-9f01-15ec-7bbc-7b3419a96f00@emrich-ebersheim.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m8yhE8w2To7Ny5lrxQ7gsu5ZAg7alwwwJ" X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --m8yhE8w2To7Ny5lrxQ7gsu5ZAg7alwwwJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="82okgqZxvq4yXotbWgsTRP5eFcP3rYC7O"; protected-headers="v1" From: Rainer Emrich To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: gcc Mailing List , christophe.lyon@linaro.org Message-ID: <782fe033-0797-5574-0d62-af3ab4bf881e@emrich-ebersheim.de> Subject: dg-extract-results broken since rev 268511, was Re: Status of 9.0.1 20190415 [trunk revision 270358] on x86_64-w64-mingw32 References: <20190415153842.GU21066@tucnak> <34226dcf-24e4-370f-0f88-a69d979aef2e@emrich-ebersheim.de> <97c67265-af2a-b3f2-eecc-168abf4b5a6c@emrich-ebersheim.de> <8baf303a-9f01-15ec-7bbc-7b3419a96f00@emrich-ebersheim.de> In-Reply-To: <8baf303a-9f01-15ec-7bbc-7b3419a96f00@emrich-ebersheim.de> --82okgqZxvq4yXotbWgsTRP5eFcP3rYC7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1368 Am 16.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > Am 15.04.2019 um 20:12 schrieb Rainer Emrich: >> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Rainer Emrich: >>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:38 schrieb Jakub Jelinek: >>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Rainer Emrich wrote: >>>>> There seems to be a generic issue with the tests in gcc/testsuite. The >>>>> log files do not contain the logs. >>>> >>>> Perhaps contrib/dg-extract-results* misbehaved? >>>> Can you look for the testsuite/g++*/g++.log.sep files? Do they contain >>>> everything? >> The *.log.sep files seem to be ok. >> >>>> If yes, can you try to say >>>> mv contrib/dg-extract-results.py{,.bad} >>>> and retry, to see if there isn't a problem with the python version the= reof? >> I will try this over the night. > The shell version of dg-extract-results does not work either. >=20 > AFAIS, there were changes to the dg-extract-results script 5th of March. > Looks like these changes are causing the issue, but I'm not sure. >=20 > What I can say, my setup works at least for the gcc-8 branch and used to > work in the past. I tested dg-extractresults.sh manually and found that the change from 4th of February, revision 268411 broke the log extraction. Easy to test with version from 23rd of September last year which works. I don't have the time to analyze the python version, but my bet, it's the same issue. --82okgqZxvq4yXotbWgsTRP5eFcP3rYC7O-- --m8yhE8w2To7Ny5lrxQ7gsu5ZAg7alwwwJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 833 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEQq4BT9NfW50eSlCTkX2ILOIqatIFAly1tsMACgkQkX2ILOIq atIpqw//eX6BOiCsg6EapUVGhHvCnHdXZ0wyX+3T6ZfAWyKdlR1R8uZG2bEMSD9L uUsKBuQlk2Fly7bEHbhK7GoRtDRDNxDBpmKV93QBtzwd4ZyFqQXEwIgmXiMn9neQ 47mBL/kYmaS2b8YOemlyCbBYnwlSdGB/NpFjZbwiPxR7jqDbrn9nkbsEaqwit3/o fIkWgf3rVDMjJm3cjCY67haVvakGUTylDgq1+fLYoFj1wlko3nrjLqxyQ8A3bVMr C3DDCQ0VjJJjH9FyOezwX4YxAzdsu02X/t/pU9PlzU3s0FbQcuRqDT/u3pR0/UkA D/1vZlrQuPJsnaunthsMyWNhNCHZzONOFPnCj14vxdgf0f7OsK44BtX5BxsWgxyD g1UyFW3gc1miUj52XjziBwrXFVFKDilgSOVhdkwXQv6JgTR4uKqcYgVtzBH3ZXrF rk3y/D09mx6LmDKUfloYn/X4zryDyCzmdXC06k6RpedIflsu3XfgC6bL0HZPPROB P8hzHjZt97xv/Zva/LUEKjX4xhDO16oXs/LMeY+++N/Qj0WFQQBNLNnr11vns7Ix qQTpVt1zeDvoQUWFjSwUFMHR8kKvTLa+aMIOrEv6Qv4V73pwTNx2Yb8syE7yMIQf aYLoJdL2RdJ7LN7745sYhIpMW9NLzIGovqvukO3zF0Zx2KaknZ8= =+nip -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --m8yhE8w2To7Ny5lrxQ7gsu5ZAg7alwwwJ--