From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7830000.1011177999@gandalf.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200201161740.JAA02347@atrus.synopsys.com>
>> Does PR 3145.patch, which affects KDE, now qualify for 3.0.4?
>
> This is a pretty scary-looking patch: more than 100k. How extensively has
> it been tested? What are the binary compatibility issues? (caring only
> about binary compatibility for code that 3.0.3 compiles correctly, of
> course). Is this fix required to get KDE working reasonably, or can
> the problem be coded around?
I don't want to try to put this in a 3.0 series release. I think we
have to wait for 3.1, which really isn't that far away at this point.
I'll have a lot more confidence about the change in that context.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-16 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-14 9:21 Robert Boehne
2002-01-14 9:21 ` David Edelsohn
2002-01-14 11:01 ` Craig Rodrigues
2002-01-16 2:02 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-16 3:59 ` Phil Blundell
2002-01-16 8:07 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-01-16 8:13 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-16 9:37 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-16 9:41 ` Paolo Carlini
2002-01-16 8:09 ` David Edelsohn
2002-01-16 8:41 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2002-01-16 9:25 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-16 9:26 ` Bradley D. LaRonde
2002-01-16 11:18 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-21 1:20 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-16 9:57 ` Craig Rodrigues
2002-01-16 10:03 ` Joe Buck
2002-01-16 11:25 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2002-01-16 11:42 ` Craig Rodrigues
2002-01-16 11:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-20 3:13 ` Plans for 3.0.4 ? (Re: new PR libstdc++/5432) Andrew Pollard
2002-01-20 11:57 ` Plans for 3.0.4 ? Richard B. Kreckel
2002-01-20 23:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-01-16 10:12 Benjamin Kosnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7830000.1011177999@gandalf.codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jbuck@synopsys.COM \
--cc=rodrigc@mediaone.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).