From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116191-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19697 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 14:35:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19661 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2005 14:35:13 -0000
Received: from bethe.phy.uc.edu (HELO bethe.phy.uc.edu) (129.137.4.14)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:35:13 +0000
Received: from [172.30.4.162] (zhivago.erc-wireless.uc.edu [172.30.4.162])
	by bethe.phy.uc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5KEZBC7018313;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:35:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878y159mhr.fsf@osv.topcon.com>
References: <878y159mhr.fsf@osv.topcon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <7a7540ae909461ad920621855369549d@physics.uc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's?
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:35:00 -0000
To: Sergei Organov <osv@topconrd.ru>
X-Spam-Score: -100 () USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00902.txt.bz2


On Jun 20, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:

> 2. The resulting assembly is different from what I get with -O1 and
>    doesn't contain the mis-optimization I'm trying to debug though it
>    doesn't seem to have anything to do with loops. For reference, the
>    code I'm trying to compile is:
>
>         extern double const osv;
>         double const osv = 314314314;
>         double osvf() { return osv; }

I don't see anything wrong with what it gives for -O0 and -O2.

-- Pinski