From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25606 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 06:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25425 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 06:22:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.171) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 06:22:26 -0000 Received: from dellpi.pinski.fam ([66.42.149.169]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP id <20040117062225.EQWD20957.smtp1.fuse.net@dellpi.pinski.fam>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:22:25 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1]) by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0H6MKLI006279; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:22:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200401170613.i0H6Dkq2027085@speedy.slc.redhat.com> References: <200401170613.i0H6Dkq2027085@speedy.slc.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <80DA8FED-48B5-11D8-833F-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , Gerald Pfeifer , Diego Novillo , "Joseph S. Myers" , Andrew Pinski From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:22:00 -0000 To: law@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01032.txt.bz2 On Jan 16, 2004, at 22:13, law@redhat.com wrote: > Err, no they aren't. For example we have a host of -f options which > control > debugging dumps rather than code generation. That's wrong. But so does C++ already, it has a couple of -fdump-* switches already. -fdump-unnumbered does not effect code gen. -fverbose-asm does not effect code gen either. -fstats (C++) does not effect code gen either. -ftime-report, -fmem-report. I could go on, why has no one changed them if they are wrong? Thanks, Andrew Pinski