From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29835 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2002 19:03:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29798 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2002 19:03:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2002 19:03:52 -0000 Received: from warlock.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9VJ1Pd01810; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:01:25 -0800 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:24:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Matt Austern cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Improved use of TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED in the C++ front end Message-ID: <82780000.1036090885@warlock.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <38A003DA-ECFD-11D6-9362-00039390D9E0@apple.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01763.txt.bz2 > I'm tempted to submit this patch first, before doing anything > else, just so that this sort of bookkeeping change doesn't get > confused with the real work later on. That's fine. > Sound reasonable to you? If so, where would be the best place > to submit that patch? I could argue for either TOT or the basic > improvements branch. BIB -- we're not going to call this a bugfix. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com