From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=MVFJ=A6=gnu.org=gcc-refused-email@sourceware.org>
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::e])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BE03858D37
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue,  9 May 2023 16:56:00 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 22BE03858D37
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
	s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
	Date; bh=PvwV3UGr1EjbDk21gS6B5fDkINeRhHojyK/d1tbWtRo=; b=SYv79Vi33qgltyPeg2ik
	W5m1E3GrqZpUB6wAwDvTTAwPyGtavotAsVAcIjtC3HpkRjyzztibChQAk5II2MaSiUY24TlTVCtBI
	Sk1WkzKljMjTX3I36PQ52Jpt/OOilYgu4ykODyTYd+Dj7DBHi256wRgwETmP7KsiVF1xcHfoX1e1E
	kEy3pSRCEn+tOvGW65/mnhnyD7WVVO3iff80hWnVp6XG5A0FT11HvNiwmjYvjfoX1G6elBhQ3XNDS
	7M/1fFZVIpcwSSP1R7wzF91ymAwXzhalauBiM38rcbgLk0I65jyEiJp7gvlzBKp2nUYBGOv8tkV8e
	w3YG1jue8S5nKg==;
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1pwQd5-00063e-9b; Tue, 09 May 2023 12:55:59 -0400
Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 19:57:02 +0300
Message-Id: <83ttwla1ep.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= <arsen@aarsen.me>
Cc: dave@killthe.net, jwakely.gcc@gmail.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <87r0rp5uf8.fsf@aarsen.me> (message from Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arse?=
 =?utf-8?Q?novi=C4=87?= via Gcc
	on Tue, 09 May 2023 18:38:05 +0200)
Subject: Re: More C type errors by default for GCC 14
References: <877cth66qb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <CAGWvnykoEtT0BQtuN70DN6tWohtf=Mm7SW55psZvVmj3OvKUEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdS5=AED+7MSe0prr8CZ-sYqnD159OjhTp9=R-a0aBZ3qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230509102201.6aa2a7d14fdb2f1e7abff449@killthe.net> <87r0rp5uf8.fsf@aarsen.me>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

> Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 18:38:05 +0200
> From: Arsen Arsenović via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
> You're actively dismissing the benefit.

Which benefit?

No one has yet explained why a warning about this is not enough, and
why it must be made an error.  Florian's initial post doesn't explain
that, and none of the followups did, although questions about whether
a warning is not already sufficient were asked.

That's a simple question, and unless answered with valid arguments,
the proposal cannot make sense to me, at least.