From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-118253-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12592 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2005 11:07:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12419 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2005 11:07:06 -0000
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.196)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:07:06 +0000
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so131082nfe
        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.143.1 with SMTP id q1mr32662nfd;
        Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.143.6 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <84fc9c0005081204071177b70e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:07:00 -0000
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Etienne Lorrain <etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections?
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050812104015.21689.qmail@web26904.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050812104015.21689.qmail@web26904.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2

On 8/12/05, Etienne Lorrain <etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>   Hello,
>=20
>  Subject says it all - I do not know if that is new. I just have a bug
>  in Gujin-1.2 with this new compiler, because function:
>=20
> __attribute__ ((section (".xcode_start"), noreturn))
> void xcodeseg_never_call_address_zero (void)
>=20
>  calls xcodeseg_BOOT1_putstr() generated by macro:
>=20
> #define GENERATE_VOID_EXTRA2CODE_INDIRECT_STUB(fctname, fctadr, params...=
) \
>         __attribute__ ((section (STRING(.Xxcode2text_ ## fctname))))  \
>         void xcodeseg_ ## fctname (params) {                            \
>         EXTRASEG_REVERSE_STUB (fctadr, STRING(.Xtext2xcode_ ## fctname));\
>         }
>=20
>  Adding ", noinline" to the attribute list fix it all, I just was wonderi=
ng
>  if inlining in between GCC sections is safe in the general case.

Please explain the problem you're seeing.  I can see nothing wrong with inl=
ining
functions within different sections in general.  If you're trying to
do things behind
the compilers back, though, be prepared to change workarounds with compiler
versions.

Richard.