From: "Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04)
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84fc9c000709060129g72e9f18cu2b415da0a1dd4ea5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46DE1713.6060607@codesourcery.com>
On 9/5/07, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Summary
> =======
>
> We are closing in on Stage 3, previously announced for September 10th.
> At this point, I'm not aware of any reason to delay that date. Are
> there any Stage 2 patches that people don't think will be submitted by
> that point?
>
> Are there Stage 1 or Stage 2 patches in need of review? I'll do my best
> to either (a) convince someone to review them, or (b) review them myself.
There is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01978.html
for example, which is not suitable for stage3.
Richard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-05 2:40 Mark Mitchell
2007-09-05 3:24 ` DJ Delorie
2007-09-05 3:35 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-05 3:50 ` DJ Delorie
2007-09-05 22:25 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-05 22:32 ` DJ Delorie
2007-09-06 8:29 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2007-09-06 9:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-09-06 9:12 ` Richard Guenther
2007-09-09 19:44 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-09 21:11 ` Roger Sayle
2007-09-09 21:19 ` Richard Guenther
2007-09-09 21:30 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-06 9:18 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-09-06 17:33 ` Fu, Chao-Ying
2007-09-06 12:35 ` Jan Hubicka
2007-09-09 19:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-10 1:19 ` Jan Hubicka
2007-09-06 13:38 ` Sebastian Pop
2007-09-06 17:53 ` Jagasia, Harsha
2007-09-09 19:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-10 16:04 ` Jagasia, Harsha
2007-09-07 14:50 ` Martin Jambor
2007-09-09 18:43 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-10 19:01 ` Martin Jambor
2007-09-25 19:49 ` Martin Jambor
2007-09-08 12:14 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-09 18:55 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-10 13:25 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-09-11 3:50 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-12 11:02 ` Kai Tietz
2007-09-13 6:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-13 8:46 ` Jan Hubicka
2007-09-13 18:42 ` Michael Meissner
2007-09-13 22:09 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-09-14 7:35 ` Kai Tietz
2007-09-13 18:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-14 8:04 ` Kai Tietz
2007-09-14 16:50 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-17 6:56 ` Kai Tietz
2007-09-17 21:31 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-10 16:20 ` Peter Bergner
2007-09-11 3:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-10 16:37 ` Michael Meissner
2007-09-13 18:37 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-13 18:44 ` Meissner, Michael
2007-09-13 18:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-09-12 12:26 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2007-09-13 18:39 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84fc9c000709060129g72e9f18cu2b415da0a1dd4ea5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).