From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-155193-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 863 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 13:37:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 809 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 13:37:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vw0-f198.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.212.198)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:36:53 +0000
Received: by vwj36 with SMTP id 36so2220495vwj.0         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.100.1 with SMTP id w1mr12330317vcn.10.1246973809623; Tue,  	07 Jul 2009 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6dc9ffc80907070631m711b4ee4h5b6713dccaf04d0d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b798aad50907070609m6d017a32l742a4a07e939724a@mail.gmail.com> 	 <6dc9ffc80907070631m711b4ee4h5b6713dccaf04d0d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:37:00 -0000
Message-ID: <84fc9c000907070636l11dab703u82a7aa6bc484fbd1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,  	Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Diego Novillo<dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
>
>> 4- Test on primary and secondary platforms. =A0What is the current
>> =A0 suggested list of platforms?
>>
>> Any and all help I can get with #2 and #4 will be appreciated.
>> For #2, I need to triage the reports to see which ones can be
>> closed already. =A0For #4, it should be a matter of testing the
>> branch with:
>>
>
> I have been testing LTO on Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64.
> I had to disable LTO test on Linux/ia64 since it miscompiled
> several Java testcases into infinite loops. I can try to find out
> which checkin caused this if needed.

I do SPEC 2000 runs on x86_64 triggered by changes on the branch.
See

http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CFP/sb-haydn-df-64/recent.html
http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-haydn-df-64/recent.html

Richard.