From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Albert Cohen <Albert.Cohen@inria.fr>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: complete_unrolli / complete_unroll
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84fc9c000909300206n65fc4a4m837badc206c99726@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <303e1d290909291123t480939f6oe83d76c7536419e1@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can't we use graphite to re-roll loops? That is, compress the
>> polyhedron by introducing a new parameter? But maybe I am
>> not good at guessing what your initial bloat issue looks like.
>>
>> The reason I'm asking is that there is enough code out in the
>> wild that has loops with manually unrolled bodies - I have seen
>> up to 16 times here.
>
> Do we want to try to address this partially in GCC 4.5? Providing
> some way to disable early unrolling either explicitly or implicitly
> when Graphite is enabled?
>
> Early unrolling can cause two problems:
>
> 1) Increase the size of SCoPs, which increases memory consumption and
> analysis time.
>
> 2) Confusing SCoP analysis.
>
> Separate from re-rolling and other long-term solutions, it would be
> helpful for Graphite if there was some explicit control over early
> unrolling to help with experimentation.
I can definitely look into that - can someone open a bugreport
and assign it to me please?
Thanks,
RIchard.
> Thanks, David
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-19 11:53 mips64 gcc 3.3.6 problem Sergey Anosov
2009-08-19 11:55 ` Paolo Carlini
2009-08-19 12:13 ` complete_unrolli / complete_unroll Albert Cohen
2009-08-19 12:33 ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-19 12:35 ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-19 13:56 ` Albert Cohen
2009-08-19 14:44 ` Albert Cohen
2009-08-19 15:09 ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-19 20:30 ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-20 8:45 ` Albert Cohen
2009-08-20 9:57 ` Richard Guenther
2009-08-20 13:34 ` Albert Cohen
2009-09-29 18:54 ` David Edelsohn
2009-09-30 12:36 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2009-08-20 11:20 Dominique Dhumieres
2009-08-20 12:25 ` Richard Guenther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84fc9c000909300206n65fc4a4m837badc206c99726@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=Albert.Cohen@inria.fr \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).