From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157437-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4161 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2009 23:00:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 4098 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2009 23:00:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vw0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f178.google.com) (209.85.212.178)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:00:01 +0000
Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so667256vws.0         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.126.150 with SMTP id c22mr6170844vcs.66.1256338799855;  	Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AE235E4.2060005@gmail.com>
References: <4AE235E4.2060005@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:08:00 -0000
Message-ID: <84fc9c000910231559y194a9ccfyfb9414f8ed04a361@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Dave Korn
<dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0Hi everyone,
>
> =A0Sorry for posting a dumb question, but it's not my strongest area: now=
 that
> cygwin is handling i18n and unicode and "all that stuff", I started seein=
g a
> whole slew of test failures, e.g.:
>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/debug/pr22514.C =A0(test for errors, line 12)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/debug/pr22514.C (test for excess errors)
>> Excess errors:
>> /gnu/gcc/releases/4.3.4-2/gcc4-4.3.4-2/src/gcc-4.3.4/gcc/testsuite/g++.d=
g/debug/pr22514.C:12:
>> error: expected unqualified-id before =E2=80=98}=E2=80=99 token
>
> =A0The reason appears to be because the testcase has single-quotes in the=
 regex
> pattern:
>
>>> $ cat g++.dg/debug/pr22514.C -n
>>> =A0 =A0 =A01 =A0/* { dg-do compile } */
>>> =A0 =A0 =A02 =A0namespace s
>>> =A0 =A0 =A03 =A0{
>>> =A0 =A0 =A04 =A0 =A0template <int> struct _List_base
>>> =A0 =A0 =A05 =A0 =A0{
>>> =A0 =A0 =A06 =A0 =A0 =A0 int _M_impl;
>>> =A0 =A0 =A07 =A0 =A0};
>>> =A0 =A0 =A08 =A0 =A0template<int i> struct list : _List_base<i>
>>> =A0 =A0 =A09 =A0 =A0{
>>> =A0 =A0 10 =A0 =A0 =A0using _List_base<i>::_M_impl;
>>> =A0 =A0 11 =A0 =A0}
>>> =A0 =A0 12 =A0} =A0/* { dg-error "expected unqualified-id before '\}'" =
} */
>>> =A0 =A0 13 =A0s::list<1> OutputModuleListType;
>
> ... where the actual compiler outputs those fancy left- and right-facing
> quotes. =A0It will probably go away if I set LC_ALL=3Dc or something like=
 that,
> but is dg-error meant to be insensitive to this kind of transformation, or
> would it be best if dg-error test patterns didn't include any kind of quo=
te
> chars that might get i14ed?

The testsuite should run with C locale.

Richard.

> =A0 =A0cheers,
> =A0 =A0 =A0DaveK
>
>