From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157476-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30208 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2009 14:06:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 29891 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2009 14:06:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.221.171)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:06:12 +0000
Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so10297441qyk.0         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.88.220 with SMTP id b28mr8933116vcm.95.1256565969737; Mon,  	26 Oct 2009 07:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mcrfx96s1b9.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <4AE4998D.7040608@starynkevitch.net> 	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910260154480.3671@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> 	 <4AE54B94.3090708@starynkevitch.net> 	 <mcrfx96s1b9.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <84fc9c000910260706q76f8f140ie300045374459426@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC?
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,  	GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net> writes:
>
>> Are you suggesting me to upload to bugzilla the nearly 3000
>> preprocessed forms of the files? I could do that, but the *.i files
>> totalize more than one gigabyte. A bzip2 compressed tar archive of
>> them is almost 80Mbytes.
>
> That is a difficulty, but without a self-contained test case it's
> pretty hard to fix the bug. =A0You can try reporting the bug with a URL
> for where to download the sources. =A0Since LTO is fairly new a
> maintainer may be willing to download them and try it. =A0Otherwise, go
> ahead and upload that 80M tar ball. =A0gcc.gnu.org will cope.

Please don't.  Bi-sect the list of object files by adding -r -nostdlib
to the link line.  This should result in a two or three file testcase.
Either attach those or reduce them with delta.

Richard.