From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3455D3857B96 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 11:28:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3455D3857B96 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1664105285; bh=IOvjVHmmAiyQp+xuaJMQJjAeOLs9PpAwCE9SYA1ycfs=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:From; b=YH/WZCUAj8X/oRTPdzvCA8yvNBCbtAdOrBsWhdUb2SoTi31TGHKAETfIDubLCzOdD fg8qdk7xqYTVl4OSv3Fe/9PFD4j5WciHt39EEb4teGCIA4c8uhiJxm9tpNTLu5Ab+j JDelrTC70EEnDy6q3blEfL2445HaSrZT5pT2KzSw= Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 765626683F; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:28:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <85ef5c4398d48c7e1c87692c5f2d56a755f19c09.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Number of ALU in la464.md From: Xi Ruoyao To: Lulu Cheng Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Wang Xuerui Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:28:02 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,MEDICAL_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, According to the schematic (https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/Loongson-3A5000-userman= ual-EN.html#la464-processor-core, Figure 5) we have 4 ALUs in LA464, but in la464.md we only define la464_alu1 and la464_alu2. Should we add la464_alu{3,4} as well, or am I missing something here? --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University