public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Kevin Handy <kth@srv.net>,  Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
	"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 08:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85vgatvvpd.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24520000.1018880545@gandalf.codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > I wouldn't advise dropping the PDP10, since it is making a
> > resurgance due to the emulators that have become available. I
> > believe this target is actually fairly new.
> I'm going to take a position here that I'll likely get flamed for, but
> so be it.

No flames here.

> I can't imagine the PDP-10, even in emulation, being used for new
> development.

XKL, the company that pays for the port, certainly expects to be able
to use it for development of new code.  Of course, the number of
developers will be very small, less than a dozen.

(And anyway, the port in it's current form isn't fit for submission to
the FSF tree.)

-- 
Lars Brinkhoff          http://lars.nocrew.org/     Linux, GCC, PDP-10,
Brinkhoff Consulting    http://www.brinkhoff.se/    HTTP programming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-15 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020412194555.GD320@codesourcery.com.suse.lists.egcs-patches>
2002-04-14 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-14 15:29   ` Kevin Handy
2002-04-14 23:24     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15  1:21       ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-15  6:35       ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15  7:46     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15  8:07       ` David S. Miller
2002-04-15  8:16         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:59           ` mike stump
2002-04-15 13:23             ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-16  2:37           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-16 22:40             ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 10:45         ` Daniel Egger
2002-04-15 12:21           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 11:56         ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 16:49         ` Richard Henderson
2002-04-15  8:20       ` Lars Brinkhoff [this message]
2002-04-15  8:33       ` Alan Lehotsky
2002-04-15 10:06       ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 10:42         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:47         ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-25 16:56           ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 18:50         ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-16  9:39           ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-16  9:59             ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-18  9:29         ` Kai Henningsen
2002-04-18 10:13           ` Paul Koning
2002-04-19 12:36             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 12:50       ` mike stump
2002-04-15 19:31       ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 19:46         ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-15 20:08           ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 23:06             ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-16  7:01             ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15 23:24         ` Neil Booth
2002-04-16  6:08           ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-17 18:13         ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-17 19:10           ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-17 20:26             ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-19 12:46           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15  0:31   ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 17:43     ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-15 17:07   ` David O'Brien
2002-04-16  0:44     ` Douglas B. Rupp
2002-04-16  4:32     ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16  7:08       ` Paul Koning
2002-04-16  7:22         ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16  3:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-04-16  6:30   ` Nick Burrett
2002-04-15  8:13 Robert Dewar
2002-04-15  9:28 Richard Kenner
2002-04-15 13:03 Robert Dewar
2002-04-16  8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-16  9:21 ` 'Zack Weinberg'
2002-04-16  9:39 ` Michael Matz
2002-04-16 12:57 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26  8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26  9:18 ` Janis Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85vgatvvpd.fsf@junk.nocrew.org \
    --to=lars.spam@nocrew.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kth@srv.net \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).