Hi!

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:00:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor.zamyatin@intel.com> wrote:
> > > Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his assignment
> > > > within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on
> > > > Cilk+ anymore.
> > > > 
> > > > Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bugfixing
> > > > and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's interested.
> > > 
> > > That's right. 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > > Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainers section?
> > 
> > I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch.
> 
> I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC,
> my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that, but
> rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then would
> need to be acked by SC.

I see.  Thanks for clarifying that formal process.


Grüße,
 Thomas