public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* stores inside loops
@ 1997-11-06 14:54 Paul Koning
  1997-11-06 15:17 ` Jeffrey A Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Koning @ 1997-11-06 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: egcs

I'm seeing a lack of optimization that surprises me...

Given the following:

extern int a[100], b[100];
extern int s;

void foo(void)
{
	int i;
	s = 0;
	for (i=0;i<100;i++)
		s += a[i] * b[i];
}

I did gcc -O3 -S for {arm, sparc, mips64, x86} and on all of these
ended up with code that does the load and store of "s" INSIDE the
loop.

Given that s is not declared volatile I had expected that the
optimizer would move the load and store outside the loop.  Was that an
unreasonable expectation?

	paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1997-11-06 15:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-11-06 14:54 stores inside loops Paul Koning
1997-11-06 15:17 ` Jeffrey A Law

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).