From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, matt@3am-software.com
Subject: Re: Should java be enabled for non-IEEE FP architectures?
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <8765xsqpn4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
References: <20020830082422.76224F2D6D@nile.gnat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/msg01969.html

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:

Robert> AFter all nearly all Java implementations on the x86 cheat and
Robert> do not use exactly the right fpt model (it is too expensive to
Robert> do so :-)

Java was redefined so that this is no longer considered cheating.
Post-1.2 an implementation is only required to implement the exact
semantics in `strictfp' classes and constant expressions.

We don't really implement strictfp yet.

Tom