From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3337 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2019 13:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3328 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2019 13:36:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:87blvyk, H*i:sk:87blvyk X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:36:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5323300C727; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (dhcp-192-200.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A4A5D6A3; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:36:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: glibc nptl/tst-cancelx18 test fails with GCC 9.2 on Arm 32-bit References: <87blvykh92.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87blvykh92.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Thu, 05 Sep 2019 15:24:57 +0200") Message-ID: <877e6mkgqi.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 * Florian Weimer: > I think since the upgrade to GCC 9.2 in Fedora, the glibc test > nptl/tst-cancelx18 (which is built with -fexceptions) fails on the Arm > 32-bit architecture (and only there). I'm not 100% certain that it's > caused by the GCC update, but the patterns of failures and passes > strongly suggests that. > > I don't know the proper name for the exact 32-bit Arm variant Fedora > uses. Its armv7 with hardware floating point, I think. > > I'm trying to get a lab machine to debug this further, but in the past, > that was difficult. Upon second thought, this must be something else, unrelated to the GCC 9.2 update. Thanks, Florian