From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27643 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2015 00:42:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27633 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2015 00:42:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:42:32 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-02x.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206] helo=SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1YTgLU-0007SW-Bu from Thomas_Schwinge@mentor.com ; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:42:28 -0800 Received: from tftp-cs (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:42:27 -0800 Received: by tftp-cs (Postfix, from userid 49978) id 1F046C2247; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:42:27 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Schwinge To: Jeff Law CC: "Zamyatin, Igor" , "Iyer, Balaji V" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , , "H.J. Lu" , "Jakub Jelinek" Subject: Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? In-Reply-To: <54F8BF10.2070701@redhat.com> References: <87r3z33g2q.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <54205555.5040506@redhat.com> <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756969B792F6@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <871tqug0ft.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <20140929110019.GC17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <54F8BF10.2070701@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <877fuvdkji.fsf@schwinge.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 2191 Hi! On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:39:44 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" wrote: > >>>> Jeff Law wrote: > >>>>> The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his= assignment > >>>>> within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to wo= rk on > >>>>> Cilk+ anymore. > >>>>> > >>>>> Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bug= fixing > >>>>> and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's = interested. > >>>> > >>>> That's right. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>>> Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainer= s section? > >>> > >>> I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch. > >> > >> I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC, > >> my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that,= but > >> rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then wou= ld > >> need to be acked by SC. > > > > Where are we on this? Do we have a maintainer for Cilk Plus > > and its run-time library? > Not at this time. There was a bit of blockage on various things with=20 > the steering committee (who approves maintainers). I've got a=20 > half-dozen or so proposals queued (including Cilk maintainership). What's the process then, that I get my Cilk Plus (libcilkrts) portability patches committed to GCC? I was advisd this must be routed through Intel (Barry M Tannenbaum CCed), which I have done months ago: I submitted the patches to Intel, and -- as I understood it -- Barry and I seemed to agree about them (at least I don't remember any requests for changes to be made on my side), but I have not seen a merge from Intel to update GCC's libcilkrts. Should I now commit to GCC the pending patches, and following? Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Thomas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 472 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU+PfBAAoJEPoxNhtoi6COHSgIALHiqsS1C03wG0DNJdFeUpHK qAgYuFBbI/K2x05ABYqBeQ5n6aMpCFf1QvDP37S9BBsXMwgolfdhmCrI+Wfv5d/O +tH+H0Hx38CCLEFssxg2w4IRYmOBuVaWGtiTd75rJBLQ5cI6BeUGExuk1NyGegOu MOo1xQsdr3K8aLdmMTQhj9qYNOVUCZSWcj60Yf9NxdM0YhOULaNTxLx60KdMm/DY Yx9m7HQcFDETXLwdiqh4ddhvJw/Qd6skA12hA7ZM+7P0ZLVAkLoqcBzsOjqEAvsx pFxlkCCyxahPsJY5ncShqGV7UfrO+DKeSo1I/s3uBpWcXZDAfgU7anZRj1pOupU= =9ZjG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--