From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-104183-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26769 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 00:18:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26758 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 00:18:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 00:18:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 5085 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 00:18:52 -0000
Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83)
  by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 00:18:52 -0000
Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:18:52 -0700
To: Eliot Dresselhaus <edressel@cisco.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug w/ inline of inline?
References: <200410172348.i9HNmoX04480@bemr-lnx-002.cisco.com>
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 06:23:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200410172348.i9HNmoX04480@bemr-lnx-002.cisco.com> (Eliot
	Dresselhaus's message of "Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:48:50 -0700")
Message-ID: <877jposwsz.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00681.txt.bz2

Eliot Dresselhaus <edressel@cisco.com> writes:

> In this example
>
>     static inline int f (int x) { return x + 1; }
>
>     static inline int g (int x, inline int f (int x))
>     { return 1 + f (x); }
>
>     int h (int x)
>     { return g (x, f); }
>
> is h supposed to optimize to return x + 2 or supposed to actually call
> f.

GCC is allowed to do either.  It would be good if it produced 
"return x + 2;"  Please file a missed-optimization bug report.

Note that declaring the parameter inline is incorrect C.

zw