From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1028 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2002 14:33:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1002 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 14:33:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 14:33:02 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (ta0201.peakpeak.com [204.144.244.201]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA30127; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:32:22 -0600 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C00F74F82B6; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:39:45 -0600 (MDT) To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Andrew Haley , Daniel Berlin , Mark Mitchell , Per Bothner , Fergus Henderson , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: RFC: Java inliner References: <15648.40350.493795.623862@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <15648.42609.739440.682415@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: I want to so HAPPY, the VEINS in my neck STAND OUT!! Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <877kk3ejf2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva writes: Alexandre> I wonder if, instead of duplicating the code from Alexandre> tree-inline.c and then modifying it to suit Java, we Alexandre> wouldn't be better off with an #if/#else/#endif (hopefully Alexandre> temporary) mess, so as to avoid divergence between these Alexandre> files... I'd rather see Andrew just check in his existing inliner. My reasoning is that eventually we'll be using the SIMPLE inliner. I think the potential divergences between now and that point won't matter much. Tom