From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20381 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2004 21:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20373 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2004 21:11:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2004 21:11:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 29282 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2004 21:11:04 -0000 Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Mar 2004 21:11:04 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:11:03 -0800 To: "R. D. Flowers" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: jFP religious wars References: <1079845736.15963.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> <405E0544.6020905@chatta.us> From: Zack Weinberg Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <405E0544.6020905@chatta.us> (R. D. Flowers's message of "Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:12:36 -0500") Message-ID: <878yhtkis8.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01274.txt.bz2 "R. D. Flowers" writes: > would not some flag like -fp-pedantic (or however to fit in the > namespace) be a good idea (for both decent sets of folks: the > fast-and-a-little-dirty and the clean-and-a-little-slow people)? Maybe. What would it do? zw