From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EED63858D32 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:02:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1EED63858D32 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-503-q0U3xug9OnKERut8xazFzQ-1; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 06:02:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: q0U3xug9OnKERut8xazFzQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AA63C10690; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.36]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A120F14682C1; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:02:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Yair Lenga Cc: Yair Lenga via Gcc Subject: Re: Safer vararg calls References: <87bku33gbd.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <16B925A2-D5E5-4731-AE79-6E6253DB350B@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 12:02:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <16B925A2-D5E5-4731-AE79-6E6253DB350B@gmail.com> (Yair Lenga's message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2022 00:24:34 +0300") Message-ID: <87a69l6y1x.fsf_-_@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:02:20 -0000 * Yair Lenga: > I prefer not to go into =E2=80=9Cflame wars=E2=80=9D on the merits of C v= s C++. My > projects are (mostly) in =E2=80=9CC=E2=80=9D and I am happy with this set= up. In > addition, given technical / organizational / business issues, > switching to C++ not an option. Sure, but you could at least use C++ to prototype the implementation and even the ABI. Thanks, Florian