public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
To: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com>
Cc: "Richard Earnshaw \(lists\)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	 Francesco	Petrogalli <Francesco.Petrogalli@arm.com>,
	 James Greenhalgh <James.Greenhalgh@arm.com>,  "Sekhar\,
	Ashwin" <Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com>,  gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,  nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [Aarch64] Vector Function Application Binary Interface Specification for OpenMP
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a7sznw5c.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526491802.29509.19.camel@cavium.com> (Steve Ellcey's message of	"Wed, 16 May 2018 10:30:02 -0700")

Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 17:30 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 16/05/18 17:21, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> > 
>> > It doesn't look like GCC has any existing mechanism for having different
>> > sets of caller saved/callee saved registers depending on the function
>> > attributes of the calling or called function.
>> > 
>> > Changing what registers a callee function saves and restores shouldn't
>> > be too difficult since that can be done when generating the prologue
>> > and epilogue code but changing what registers a caller saves/restores
>> > when doing the call seems trickier.  The macro
>> > TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED doesn't know anything about the
>> > function being called.  It returns true/false depending on just the
>> > register number and mode.
>> > 
>> > Steve Ellcey
>> > sellcey@cavium.com
>> > 
>> 
>> Actually, we can.  See, for example, the attribute((pcs)) for the ARM
>> port.  I think we could probably handle this automagically for the SVE
>> vector calling convention in AArch64.
>> 
>> R.
>
> Interesting, it looks like one could use aarch64_emit_call to emit
> extra use_reg / clobber_reg instructions but in this case we want to
> tell the caller that some registers are not being clobbered by the
> callee.  The ARM port does not
> define TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED and that seemed like one
> of the most problamatic issues with Aarch64.  Maybe we would have to
> undefine this for aarch64 and use explicit clobbers to say what
> floating point registers / vector registers are clobbered for each
> call?  I wonder how that would affect register allocation.

TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED is the only current way
of saying that an rtl instruction preserves the low part of a
register but clobbers the high part.  We would need something like
Alan H's CLOBBER_HIGH patches to do it using explicit clobbers.

Another approach would be to piggy-back on the -fipa-ra infrastructure
and record that vector PCS functions only clobber Q0-Q7.  If -fipa-ra
knows that a function doesn't clobber Q8-Q15 then that should override
TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED.  (I'm not sure whether it does
in practice, but it should :-)  And if it doesn't that's a bug that's
worth fixing for its own sake.)

Thanks,
Richard

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-09 21:47 Steve Ellcey
2018-05-15 18:29 ` Francesco Petrogalli
2018-05-16 16:21   ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-16 16:30     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2018-05-16 17:30       ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-16 21:11         ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2018-05-24 17:50           ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-26 10:09             ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-26 22:13               ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-27 15:59               ` Jeff Law
2018-05-29 10:06                 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-31 10:39                   ` Alan Hayward
2018-06-12  3:11                     ` Jeff Law
2018-06-11 23:06                   ` Jeff Law
2018-07-02 18:16     ` Francesco Petrogalli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-15  9:50 Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-03-17 14:02 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-03-20  4:30   ` Sekhar, Ashwin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a7sznw5c.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.sandiford@linaro.org \
    --cc=Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com \
    --cc=Francesco.Petrogalli@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Greenhalgh@arm.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=sellcey@cavium.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).