From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86ADD3858292 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:16:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 86ADD3858292 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-417-ae-y449vMfWJaan8PNxY9w-1; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:16:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ae-y449vMfWJaan8PNxY9w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBEFC802E5C; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.103]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF66C18EAA; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:16:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Yair Lenga via Gcc Cc: Yair Lenga Subject: Re: Gcc Digest, Vol 29, Issue 7 References: Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 14:16:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Yair Lenga via Gcc's message of "Tue, 5 Jul 2022 10:19:59 +0300") Message-ID: <87bku33gbd.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:16:46 -0000 * Yair Lenga via Gcc: > My question: does anyone know how much effort it will be to add a new GCC > built-in (or extension), that will automatically generate a descriptive > format string, consistent with scanf formatting, avoiding the need to > manually enter the formatting string. It's already possible to do this with C++. Can't you just use C++ instead? Thanks, Florian