From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-118534-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1114 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2005 08:40:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 873 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Aug 2005 08:39:31 -0000
Received: from mail.enyo.de (HELO mail.enyo.de) (212.9.189.167)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:39:31 +0000
Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1E7UIr-0006Ca-Tz; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:38:42 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1E7UIe-0003xM-13; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:38:28 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,  Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,  Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>,  Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@gmail.com>,  "John M. Gabriele" <john_sips_tea@yahoo.com>,  java@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: please update the gcj main page
References: <20050714170120.42741.qmail@web80903.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
	<42D763A1.2060608@gmail.com> <42D7D646.8010209@redhat.com>
	<m3slyflrxn.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010029200.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<1122850827.32467.42.camel@linux.site>
	<Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010101220.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<1122851829.32467.46.camel@linux.site>
	<Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010130440.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:48:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010130440.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	(Gerald Pfeifer's message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2005 01:31:14 +0200 (CEST)")
Message-ID: <87br3pgi9n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00615.txt.bz2

* Gerald Pfeifer:

> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> For code.
>> I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much
>> easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code.
>
> I have seen such statements, by RMS himself.

The official position might have changed (e.g. copyright assignments
and documentation).