From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Lisa M. Opus Goldstein" <opus@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 07:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87brzoay7t.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030403054803.GC22149@daikokuya.co.uk> (Neil Booth's message of "Thu, 3 Apr 2003 06:48:03 +0100")
Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:-
>
>> Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>>
>> > 3) If you are currently working on changes to the manual(s) or are
>> > aware of pressing issues, please let us know ASAP so that we can
>> > take that into account and try to address them, respectively.
>>
>> The CPP manual is out of date in several respects - I have not been
>> prioritizing fixing that, but I can bump it up.
>
> What's out of date?
Mostly that I think all the comparisons to 2.95 behavior are less
useful now than they could be; and there are places where it talks
about something having changed in 'this release' where 'this release'
was 3.0.
zw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-03 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-01 23:38 Gerald Pfeifer
2003-04-02 20:47 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-04-03 4:32 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-04-03 5:48 ` Janis Johnson
2003-04-03 6:16 ` Neil Booth
2003-04-03 7:54 ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2003-04-03 8:39 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-04-08 19:06 ` Janis Johnson
2003-05-15 10:22 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2003-05-15 14:23 ` Lisa M. Opus Goldstein
2003-05-18 22:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-05-15 22:14 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-05-21 20:24 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-05-21 20:28 ` Douglas B Rupp
2003-05-21 20:41 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-05-23 17:59 ` [PATCH] Remove VMS section in documentation (was Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed) Douglas B Rupp
2003-05-22 19:06 ` HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed Lisa M. Opus Goldstein
2003-05-21 22:17 Stephan T. Lavavej
2003-05-22 3:08 ` Simon Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87brzoay7t.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com \
--to=zack@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=neil@daikokuya.co.uk \
--cc=opus@gnu.org \
--cc=pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).