From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@nildram.co.uk>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@sygehus.dk>,
Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>,
Jie Zhang <jzhang918@gmail.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
hp@gcc.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eje34vui.fsf@firetop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47531D1D.8020805@codesourcery.com> (Mark Mitchell's message of "Sun\, 02 Dec 2007 13\:01\:17 -0800")
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Anyway, given that there have been objections to the patch generally,
>> I realise that the pre-approval is void.
>
> I think there's no controversy over the libstdc++ change, so let's put
> that in. If nothing else, it makes the libstdc++ configury more
> self-consistent; if we decide to change the overall strategy, then we
> can do that all at once.
Well, Rask's patch would make the libstdc++ change unnecessary,
so it seems premature to change libstdc++ now. (Not that I'm objecting
to anyone else doing it. I'm just not comfortable doing it myself,
especially since, on its own, it doesn't affect any of "my" targets.)
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-03 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 11:56 Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 12:25 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 12:52 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 13:13 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 13:15 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 13:27 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 13:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-18 14:11 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 14:02 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 14:27 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 14:48 ` Jie Zhang
2007-11-27 14:10 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-27 22:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-27 22:46 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-27 23:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-27 23:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 0:19 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 0:43 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 0:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 0:55 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 1:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 1:14 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 2:14 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 13:30 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 1:28 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-11-28 2:07 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 2:40 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-11-28 8:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 13:17 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 11:40 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-11-28 13:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-28 14:32 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-28 17:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-28 19:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 21:04 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-28 22:42 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-29 6:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 19:37 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 19:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 22:19 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-01 9:48 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-12-01 11:53 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-01 12:03 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-01 13:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-12-01 22:35 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-02 21:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-12-04 14:46 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-29 22:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-29 23:18 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-29 23:33 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2007-11-30 16:11 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 16:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 22:18 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 17:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-30 18:17 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 20:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 21:17 ` DJ Delorie
2007-12-01 9:55 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-12-02 21:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-12-03 15:55 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2007-11-30 22:48 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
[not found] ` <20071203092630.N17510@dair.pair.com>
[not found] ` <87d4tn4v94.fsf@firetop.home>
2007-12-03 18:13 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 18:59 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-28 1:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-09-18 13:55 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-18 14:19 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 16:09 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-18 17:45 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-19 3:43 ` Jie Zhang
2007-11-28 1:34 Benjamin Kosnik
2007-11-28 2:04 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-11-28 3:11 ` Benjamin Kosnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eje34vui.fsf@firetop.home \
--to=rsandifo@nildram.co.uk \
--cc=bernds_cb1@t-online.de \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hp@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jzhang918@gmail.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=rask@sygehus.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).