From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-114652-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2660 invoked by alias); 19 May 2005 19:58:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27243 invoked from network); 19 May 2005 19:49:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 May 2005 19:49:23 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4JJmGcC009189;
	Thu, 19 May 2005 15:48:16 -0400
Received: from firetop.home (vpn50-87.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.87])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4JJmFO08617;
	Thu, 19 May 2005 15:48:16 -0400
Received: from rsandifo by firetop.home with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DYr05-0004qz-Go; Thu, 19 May 2005 20:48:09 +0100
From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GCC List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <17009.2368.986169.753001@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<200505170311.03979.stevenb@suse.de>
	<20050517011655.GA25562@synopsys.com>
	<200505170331.25016.stevenb@suse.de>
	<1116321262.8237.837.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local>
	<20050517164335.GA12338@synopsys.com> <428A25BA.6050308@OARcorp.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0505171740300.29492@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	<87zmut0ztl.fsf@firetop.home>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0505181253450.7594@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 21:53:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505181253450.7594@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	(Joseph S. Myers's message of "Wed, 18 May 2005 12:59:58 +0000 (UTC)")
Message-ID: <87ekc32e12.fsf@firetop.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01090.txt.bz2

"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Wed, 18 May 2005, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> FWIW, those mips messages _were_ sent with test_summary.  I'm not
>> sure why they got mangled.  Are there any known issues that would
>> cause that?
>
> What awk version are you using?  (The script tests for gawk, nawk, awk if 
> $AWK is not set.)  Experimenting suggests that mawk is deficient in this 
> regard: where the script extracts the version number
>
> $2 == "version" { save = $0; $1 = ""; $2 = ""; version = $0; gsub(/^ */, 
> "", version); gsub(/\r$/, "", version); $0 = save; }
>
> mawk loses the spaces whereas gawk or nawk do not.

Good catch!  I was indeed using mawk.  I've installed gawk now,
so hopefully next time it should work...

Richard