From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12391 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 21:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12384 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 21:08:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gash2.peakpeak.com) (207.174.178.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 21:08:57 -0000 Received: from fleche.redhat.com (tf0239.peakpeak.com [204.144.239.239]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28181; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:08:26 -0700 Received: by fleche.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABF124F875B; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:05:05 -0700 (MST) To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, aph@redhat.com, Jason Merrill Subject: Re: On alignment References: <200303251122.13693.kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca> <200303251344.59988.kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom X-Zippy: I decided to be JOHN TRAVOLTA instead!! Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200303251344.59988.kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: <87el4vw41q.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01569.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin B Hendricks writes: Kevin> Will having long long int aligned to 8 and double aligned to 4 Kevin> create any problems for gcj if a similar alignment macro is Kevin> used for gcj given that doubles and long long int are Kevin> different? I'm not certain. My understanding is that g++ does all the field alignment in the front end, while gcj completely relies on stor-layout to do it. So the question is whether g++ (with whatever hack we're adding to the generated headers) and stor-layout agree in the above scenario. Tom