From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117450 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2019 21:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117442 invoked by uid 89); 27 Dec 2019 21:29:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=dez, Jim, jim, Key X-HELO: mail-out.m-online.net Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 21:29:12 +0000 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47l0M65t1Fz1qql4; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:29:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47l0M632wtz1w9Mk; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:29:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LdKlMHf0VOU; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:29:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-168-180.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.168.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:29:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C49BB2C0172; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:29:04 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Joseph Myers Cc: Roman Zhuykov , Segher Boessenkool , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Alexander Monakov , Maxim Kuvyrkov , esr@thyrsus.com Subject: Re: Test GCC conversion with reposurgeon available References: <28ca5dbe-a29e-7f1e-a599-d80709643421@ispras.ru> <20191224155543.GH4505@gate.crashing.org> <20191224181444.GJ4505@gate.crashing.org> <279bf8dd-8725-c3fa-0def-130b3d128509@ispras.ru> <871rssiigs.fsf@hase.home> <87woakh25b.fsf@hase.home> X-Yow: Yow! We're going to a new disco! Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 21:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Joseph Myers's message of "Wed, 25 Dec 2019 15:36:38 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <87h81lbgpr.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 On Dez 25 2019, Joseph Myers wrote: > On investigation, I think you are referring to the conversion of r269472. > That was committed for you by Jim Wilson and thus has you as author and > Jim Wilson as committer and Jim Wilson's timezone entry has been applied. > So the argument here is that the author's timezone information should be > applied to the author date, and the committer's timezone information > should be applied to the committer date. I expect that should be > straightforward (although when coming from SVN, there's also an argument > that we only have committer dates so the committer timezone is the > relevant one to apply). SVN also only has a committer, so the fabricated author should not be influenced by the committer. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."