From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25213 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 15:17:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25205 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 15:17:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 15:17:39 -0000 Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198M06-00017X-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:17:34 -0700 To: Nitin Gupta Cc: joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com, mark@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, ngupta@globespanvirata.com Subject: Re: Target deprecation list From: Zack Weinberg Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030423093232.11711.qmail@web8104.in.yahoo.com> (Nitin Gupta's message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:32:32 +0100 (BST)") Message-ID: <87he8pckfl.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) References: <20030423093232.11711.qmail@web8104.in.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01154.txt.bz2 Nitin Gupta writes: > framework due to the new stabs constructs being > generated by GCC. To keep sync with lattest GCC > releases we are willing to make further changes too, > however it won't be feasible at such a short notice. > If the community defers its plans to 'remove' > sparclet-aout till GCC 3.4 sparclet users > too would be able to keep pace with the GCC releases. Just for the record, *all* the targets we are discussing removing would be removed from GCC 3.4. They would be present in GCC 3.3 but would print a warning message when configured. zw