From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173847-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20575 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 19:40:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 20564 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 19:40:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:40:32 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3CJeS8r024095	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:40:28 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3CJeQQa021058	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:40:27 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,        Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,        Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>,        Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,        Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>,        David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8
References: <4F7B356E.9080003@google.com>	<CAGWvnymDHXtN1AR9hdrYpV7UVw-rkk5ZiM0kS9DbVLY24xQ-6Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAiZkiA29bnrEHg3jHyOtmdFo1HewaW-rp3KYOKC+gfEQ1pXzA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc0wG3ha4B4BgA6g4NPnBG6Pj3iuMZ+_B+3AOgBkKvXpLg@mail.gmail.com>	<4F7C35A3.3080207@codesourcery.com>	<CAFiYyc0knheu7jRBUd5Vtva5Bj7GBypzCQ9BFmFYGXzLcFBYGA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAAkRFZ+4RfHszKh50DW1wKSis0wo3516Hy8626FNpYwgGWdABQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20120410084614.GJ6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>	<CAAkRFZKFu234Q7+Rm+DRpDJPe9Rr0jtxh26sZWVVeEE1mCDfwg@mail.gmail.com>	<20120410163905.GK6148@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>	<CAAiZkiACxHi24=UkNJu5W3VcE7dWssF-giY6dFyf1XWvC-Oxqg@mail.gmail.com>	<4F8463EF.5090400@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:40:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <4F8463EF.5090400@google.com> (Diego Novillo's message of "Tue,	10 Apr 2012 12:46:39 -0400")
Message-ID: <87iph4zql1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:

Diego> Tom, I'm thinking of that patch on black listing functions.  There was
Diego> also the idea of a command that would only step in the outermost
Diego> function call of an expression.

That patch went in.  The new command is called "skip".

I don't think anybody has worked on stepping into just the outermost
function call of an expression.

Tom