From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <whitebox@nefkom.net>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2703838031
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 May 2022 14:39:20 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org CA2703838031
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=linux-m68k.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net
Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182])
 by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4L222H4vmtz1r3F2;
 Mon, 16 May 2022 16:39:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70])
 by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4L222H2lKtz1qqkD;
 Mon, 16 May 2022 16:39:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de
Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182])
 by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Abkxn9ZnXwLd; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:39:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-Auth-Info: mdtSFyD0/+dgUOvRaJYg/M1mnGl1o18apo4LXljTUXZAaNjI5RhLI6p7WbG6gO+Z
Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-175-121.dynamic.mnet-online.de
 [46.244.175.121])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
 Mon, 16 May 2022 16:39:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 3689F2C3A72; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:39:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Andreas Krebbel via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: CFI for saved argument registers
References: <7d266787-9a64-07e6-bf7b-1bd01119517c@linux.ibm.com>
X-Yow: My forehead feels like a PACKAGE of moist CRANBERRIES in a remote
 FRENCH OUTPOST!!
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:39:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <7d266787-9a64-07e6-bf7b-1bd01119517c@linux.ibm.com> (Andreas
 Krebbel via Gcc's message of "Mon, 16 May 2022 08:29:32 +0200")
Message-ID: <87k0ala6eh.fsf@igel.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 14:39:22 -0000

On Mai 16 2022, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc wrote:

> The only way I see right now is adding a new reg note to invalidate
> the save information in the reg_save array in dwarf2cfi.
>
> Would this be acceptable? Is there perhaps an easier way to achieve that?

Doesn't it work to use .cfi_remember_state/.cfi_restore_state?

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."