From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-199725-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10983 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2019 08:30:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10828 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2019 08:30:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:424, shipping
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:30:35 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CCA930832D3;	Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:30:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (dhcp-192-200.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.200])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D60D643DA;	Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Romain Geissler <romain.geissler@amadeus.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,  Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,  <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: Can LTO minor version be updated in backward compatible way ?
References: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1907171350160.51264@ncerndobedev5004.etv.nce.amadeus.net>	<87ftn4in6x.fsf@linux.intel.com>	<71c86eab-4178-e841-f968-b4425f851dd3@redhat.com>	<87ftn3z5fz.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>	<alpine.LSU.2.20.1907182251050.48467@ncerndobedev5004.etv.nce.amadeus.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:30:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1907182251050.48467@ncerndobedev5004.etv.nce.amadeus.net>	(Romain Geissler's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:59:09 +0000")
Message-ID: <87k1cetoig.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2

* Romain Geissler:

> That may fly in the open source world, however I expect some vendors
> shipping proprietary code might be fine with assembly/LTO
> representation of their product, but not source.

They can't ship LTO today anyway due to the format incompatibility, so
that's not really an argument against source-based LTO.

Thanks,
Florian